I have no idea where my shirt
was made. I mean, I can take off my shirt, look at the tag, and see “made in Honduras”,
but that really doesn’t tell me that much. In our New Global Voices class, we
opened by checking the tags of what we were wearing that day and putting the
locations up on the board. Most came from China, some from the US, and some
from other places like Bangladesh. Bangladesh is actually the perfect example
of what I would like to address here. Around a month ago, a factory in
Bangladesh collapsed killing (as of March 15th) over one thousand
workers. This is, in the world’s greatest understatement, an issue.
Now,
on to the solution. What can we do to fix this? Obviously we cannot bring 1000
people back to life, and no matter how much fun burning down some sweatshops
sounds, there are more effective ways we can address this issue. That’s right –
we as consumers HAVE to do something. That is the only way this problem will
get fixed. In an incredibly recent survey
street shoppers were questioned about their views on ethical clothing. They
were asked whether or not the inevitable price hike of ethical clothing would
turn them off from purchasing it. The response was, for the most part, as
expected. In spirit, shoppers would be willing to pay that extra 5% or 20% of
however much it would cost to support ethical, sweatshop-less
manufacturers. But really think about
this for a moment. If you, the consumer, walked in to a store and saw two
identical shirts, one for 20 dollars and the other for 12, which one would you really pick? I don’t believe it is
possible to guilt trip consumers into spending eight dollars more per shirt,
because people will just carry on with their lives and think “oh it’s OK
because I’m saving myself money I’m such a smart shopper”.
In
situations like this, positive emotion will trump negative almost every time.
What I mean by this is that it telling the consumer that they are horrible
people for supporting sweat shops and indirectly responsible for the death of
thousands will be less effective than rewarding the shoppers who support
non-sweatshop clothing. This article
(scroll down, its longer) offers what I believe to a great solution. The store
Rapanui boats the fair trade symbol. Not only this, but all of the clothing’s
tags come with a grade based off of ethicality of its production but also its
eco-friendliness.
This “eco-labeling” system gives the buyer a quick and
easy visual representation of the quality of their product. Going back to the
identical shirts, if one of them had an “A” grade while the other had a “C”
grade, I would for sure shell out the additional eight dollars. What’s great
about this is that it raises awareness (which was lacking previously) as to
which shirt will lead to another factory collapse and which gives you a sense
of moral victory. I really hope what Rapanui is doing spreads to other
retailers, as this could drastically reduce accidents.
-Philip
No comments:
Post a Comment