Sunday, May 19, 2013

Rana Plaza Tragedy in Bangladesh: an Excuse or a Genuine Step Forward in Ethical Fashions?

   The Rana Plaza fire has resulted in a worldwide response from companies who use Bangladeshi ready-made garment (RMG) factories to sew products. In fact, the crisis sparked a major global dialogue about the immediate need to reconsider the safety regulations in the RMG factories, especially in Bangladesh, which produces the second largest amount of RMG to textile companies in the world. The Bangladeshi RMG industry is dominated by about 2 million women working in illegally made buildings resting on soft and unstable ground, like the Rana Plaza. BBC news reports that many companies using Bangladeshi factories to supply their RMG stock are pressured to reevaluate the measures needed in factory and worker safety. The Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh was made just three days ago, on May 13, 2013, which includes measures for all signatories to be more thorough in regulating Bangladeshi factory safety, especially from fires:

                     “The agreement expands to five years (from two) a fire and building safety program to be led by a multi-stakeholder task force for the purposes of establishing an in-factory training program; facilitating the creation of factory health and safety committees; reviewing existing building regulations and enforcement; developing a worker complaint process and mechanism for workers to report health and safety risks; and advising a lead Safety Inspector.”

            The fire and the Accord both contribute to the growing pressure put on large companies that use Bangladeshi RMG services. Large European companies like H&M, which uses the most Bangladeshi RMG of any company in the world, and the American entity PVH (which owns Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger), are two major corporations that have already signed the Accord. US’ Gap is currently unhappy with binding terms and is pursuing separate initiatives to ensure worker safety. Wal-mart immediately fired its Canadian-based jeans supplier, Fame Jeans, when pictures of unauthorized production of jeans with the Fame Jeans label were pictured in the Rana Plaza rubble. The NY Times writes that Wal-Mart was involved in another fire incident last year at the Tarzeen Fashions factory outside of Dhaka, which had barred windows that prevented workers from escaping: “the parallels to New York’s Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire, in 1911, where doors were locked and a hundred and forty-six workers died in the space of twenty minutes, are obvious.”


            The parallels between the Shirtwaist Factory fire in 1911 and the more recent Bangladeshi factories both signify the problems surrounding industrialization and the demands of a free market society. As the US’ role in global trade has grown and supplying factories have relocated to the developing world, it seems that the search for cheap labor and demands of western markets result in the negligence of worker’s interests. And do these crises such as the Rana Plaza fire really change anything other than the immediate concern of safety regulations? Although it is great that companies will be more involved in preventing future fire crises in Bangladesh RMG factories, will companies actually invest in safety provisions or is this an empty promise? The natural response to the crisis reflects only how companies act once under pressure of a worldwide scandal, but under normal circumstances do companies actually care about the well being of its workers? I think that it is important to find companies who are invested in the safety of their workers, but safety regulations will not end the ultimate problems of the textile industry: economic powerhouses like European and American companies going to cheap labor for inexpensive producing. The problems of today's society come more with the immoral standards of powerful executives who know that the garment industry is easy to take advantage of. Elizabeth Cline, the author of Overdressed: The Shockingly High Cost of Cheap Fashion,"explains how the globalization of the garment industry made it possible for us to buy cheap fashion but often with a hidden price tag for human rights and the environment." NPR Fresh Air- Ethical Fashion: Is The Tragedy In Bangladesh A Final Straw?


            Just because companies move toward signing and taking part in safety provisions does not mean the products are ethically made. The workers are still crammed into a building, have little wages (more than 80% living on less than $2 per day), and minimal or no welfare or benefits. A safety and fire accord is a great start, but I hope that this is not the end in transforming sweatshops into ethical working places.

            I had a deep conversation with my mom the other day about the standards of shoppers in today’s world. She told me that they seem less concerned with ethical production and more concerned with styles and price. She owns a Target card, a Costco card, and a Macy’s card. When she shops at Target, Costco, or Macy’s, she notices that her tendency is to find the best deal around. When it comes to clothing, especially, she doesn’t even bother looking at the place it was made and is more preoccupied with the style and cost. However, even if she did check the country of origin, it says little about its type of ethical production. Between Malaysia and the United States, I would assume that the shirt homemade in America would be more ethically made. However, NY and LA’s garment industry still uses sweatshops in which many violate minimum wages and practice poor treatment of workers (98% of LA factories have workplace and health and safety problems that could possibly lead to death or serious injury). Thus, I think it is important to reconsider the assumption we make that the United States is a paradigm in the factory world, and that developing countries are the only ones riddled with sweatshops. With this in mind, there needs to be a system to help shoppers find ethically made sources for their products. Especially to help shoppers identify ethically produced clothing, a type of ranking from 1-20 (that already exists) or certification by the FDA should be federally required on clothing products available at large department stores like Nordstrom and Macy’s and convenience stores like Target, Costco and Wal-Mart.  Hopefully the transition continues and the world’s RMG factories are efficient but respect the workers as first class citizens, too. 

No comments:

Post a Comment